Pride and Prejudice
This is
supposed to be a re-read, I am positive I read “Pride and Prejudice” some 20
years ago, but except for recalling the names of the main protagonists, it turned
out that I remembered absolutely nothing from first time round. So, this felt
as a first read. I am a bit disappointed with myself, “Pride and Prejudice” is
a good enough book to be recalled even that many years later.
In many ways
“Pride and Prejudice” resembles the earlier “Sense and Sensibility”, but given
that we are dealing with the same period, women from the same station in life
and protagonists with similar traits, that is likely to be expected. Certainly,
I can pour very similar praise onto the books.
Elizabeth
Bennet is one of five sisters being raised by a very liberal gentleman father
and a silly, emptyheaded mother from a lower station. Stations in life is super
important in Austen’s worlds and the Bennet family is well enough off that they
live in a manor with butler and maids, but not considered wealthy or important
as such. Elizabeth is a smart and perceptive woman and her main difference from
Elinor is that she is frank and independent minded. Traits that also sets her
apart from women in general in this book.
The story
revolves around her relations with a gentleman (from a higher station) called
Mr. Darcy. When they meet early on, Darcy’s friend Mr. Bingley starts a
relationship with Elizabeth’s sister Jane, Darcy feels superior to Elizabeth
family and refuse any interaction (pride), and Elizabeth in her place forms an
image of Darcy as a haughty and very unlikable character (prejudice). Although
we as readers sense already in the early pages of the book that there is a
similarity of mind between these two characters, in their heads they could not
be farther from each other.
The
development of the story is how these two sentiments are gradually broken down in
a process where both of them learns to check themselves and get a better
perspective on the both themselves and the world around them. The immediate
agency may be a partiality, to use an Austen word, or love to be more vulgar,
but that is way too simple. That is just what sets them in motion. The real
agency is their interaction, how learning about each other and seeing more
sides to the coin breaks down initial perceptions. I think this is the element
that I like the most about “Pride and Prejudice”. Instead of taking the easy
way (a love story) and some melodrama to form a crisis, this is about character
development and not through magic and a friendly writer, but in ways we can
relate to as real people.
This would
not be Austen though if the world was not populated with curious characters.
Like “Sense and Sensibility” all principal and quite a few of the secondary
characters have traits so pronounced to be almost caricatures. This makes them
highly entertaining, but Austen never goes so far as to make them unrealistic.
Mrs. Bennet is the fussy and emptyheaded mother, Mr. Collins the pedantic and
servile clergyman, Catherine de Bourgh haughty and arrogant, Lydia Bennet frivolous
and stupid. My favorite character is Elizabeth father, Mr. Bennet who has
decided to enjoy the entertainment value of all the ridiculousness going on
around him rather than being rattled by it. He takes a slightly cynical view,
but is entirely lovable.
Beside the character
development theme, there are a lot of currents going through “Pride and Prejudice”.
Again, we have a window into the world from women’s perspective which from my
point of view appears frustratingly limited. Elizabeth however is a pattern
breaker, the beginning of a rebel, simply for forming her own mind and acting
on it, but ever so often the women are left to sit back and worry, leaving the
acting to the men. I sense Austen feels this confinement, but the rebellion
starts from a very repressed point. We also get a lot of insights into the do’s
and don’t’s in the Regency world of gentility. So much is said and done by
hints and mutual understanding of the codes and we are not even talking about
the Victorian era. We get insights into what forms the ultimate in humiliation
and degradation when Elizabeth’s sister elopes with the scoundrel Wickham.
“Pride and
Prejudice” feels slightly more mature than “Sense and sensibility” but ticks
all the same boxes. I had a great time reading it and can absolutely recommend
it, although I may be the last person in the universe to discover it.
I'm with you all the way on Mr. Bennett! To me the most ridiculous is Mr. Collins. I love him. Poor Charlotte. But that was another illustration of what women did to get by at the time. Jane Austen is such an enigma. A preacher's daughter who never married. Yet she had so much insight into manners and people. Next up I think is "Emma". That novel rivals this one in my opinion. Emma is a very different character than either Elinor or Elizabeth. It's a funny coming of age story.
SvarSletI was surprised that it was Charlotte who got married to Collins. I thought Mary was the perfect fit, but then again , maybe the idea was to prove the point about women marrying to secure themselves rather than for love. A sad point really.
SletI am completely unfamiliar with Emma, but if you vouch for it, then I am certain I will love it.
I was wrong. It’s Mansfield Park coming up next. That’s good too of course.
SletActually I switched them myself, so I already started om Emma. I think my version of the Book has them switched. Emma is from 1815 and Mansfield Park only from 1817.
SletFinally an Austin book with a heroine who doesn't need to worry about money! But that doesn't preclude a beautiful character arc and some funny characters. I'm going to listen to it while I get ready to move.
SletIt was indeed a good book and interesting with a different viewpoint.
SletI did not know you were moving?
Yes, we are moving to Las Vegas where my brother and his many children and grandchildren live. I am caring for my husband and I need the moral support of my family. We're pretty isolated here. I've moved a lot in my life but I must say it's even less fun when you are older.
SletI can imagine that. Las Vegas is an ... Interesting choice. I hope it works out and that you will not miss California too much.
SletLas Vegas was the only choice if I wanted to be near several members of my family. I doubt I will be gambling often.
SvarSlet